Jason Liew

 

 

If probabilities exist, why God?

A common paradox heard in Maths faculty of universities.

 

 

                              

 

In finance discipline,

we call this the “market price of risk”.

Derived from CAPM,

it’s so far the most systematic crap/lie/theory

in explaining how financial markets work.

 

Perhaps how much risk you’re willing to take,

has a good correlation with how well you’re rewarded in life.

The desperate that robs bank,

the smart that tries to beat casino,

They’re but, a game of probability.

 

As Charles Darwin proposed Survival of The Fittest,

we witness people like Paris Hilton

in which the cell-formation of embryo

is indeed the final chapter of her odds-beating game in life.

 

 

However,

the greatest hypocrisy of Evolution,

rest in Molecular Biology questioning the biggest anomaly of science,

as every particle has the inherent nature of

breaking down into the simplest form or state.

 

If so,

the theorem of “Evolving-into-complicated-creatures”

contradicts, and breeds failure out of, its own success.

If so,

the most risky thing in life,

shouldn’t be the realisation of negative states,

but the decision not to take any.

A stability derived from iteration.

A constant.

 

If particle breaks down, How life?

Things fall apart, anyway.

If risk excites, why NOT?

 

 

 

1 comment

 

Envy, I used to envy people that derive most out of something,

2 majors in 1 degree,

3 university-club titles in 1 semester,

4 catch-ups in 1 day…

 

While life itself makes sure everyone’s a loser at the end,

winners are commonly-defined

as individuals with the most to lose, upon earthly-departure.

 

Since,

“Idle” and “Excess” became bad terms.

It means wastage, inefficiency, or sub-optimality.

 

And “busy” becomes the most powerful word in English.

It blocks work-inflow with respect.

It ends awkward conversations with dignity.

It even kills relationship with delay.

 

People don’t usually leave multiple-choice-question unfilled.

They take their chance.

People don’t idle or wait long.

They take that as guilt.

 

Equating optimality to zero-vacancy,

is a fallacy of mankind

to acknowledge that the idle-capacity of life

has its utility.

Less is more.

 

Howdoyoufeelaboutthissentence?

We live like this.

Most of us.

 

While people go all means to be fast

I enjoy the Monday that I wake up at 3pm.

I enjoy the hours spent looking into her eyes and do nothing.

While life has all things to offer

I enjoy being the fool that forgo some of the chases

Not the people that chasing to be full.

Now, it’s sympathy.

No comments