Jason Liew

 

 

If probabilities exist, why God?

A common paradox heard in Maths faculty of universities.

 

 

                              

 

In finance discipline,

we call this the “market price of risk”.

Derived from CAPM,

it’s so far the most systematic crap/lie/theory

in explaining how financial markets work.

 

Perhaps how much risk you’re willing to take,

has a good correlation with how well you’re rewarded in life.

The desperate that robs bank,

the smart that tries to beat casino,

They’re but, a game of probability.

 

As Charles Darwin proposed Survival of The Fittest,

we witness people like Paris Hilton

in which the cell-formation of embryo

is indeed the final chapter of her odds-beating game in life.

 

 

However,

the greatest hypocrisy of Evolution,

rest in Molecular Biology questioning the biggest anomaly of science,

as every particle has the inherent nature of

breaking down into the simplest form or state.

 

If so,

the theorem of “Evolving-into-complicated-creatures”

contradicts, and breeds failure out of, its own success.

If so,

the most risky thing in life,

shouldn’t be the realisation of negative states,

but the decision not to take any.

A stability derived from iteration.

A constant.

 

If particle breaks down, How life?

Things fall apart, anyway.

If risk excites, why NOT?